A sample text widget
Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis
euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.
Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan.
Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem,
suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.
|
It’s time for this week’s Luddite Pillory, in which space-related silliness is held up for ridicule and scorn!
- “See, I told you: Armstrong converted to Islam as soon as he set foot on the moon and heard the adhan. All this is proven by their naming of their new moon-ship with an Arabic word. They deny it, but they give the game away!”
Seriously, though: how wonderful it is that people at NASA nowadays are fans of a franchise representing the “manly virtues” and scrappy, hands-on exploration, instead of a franchise populated with prissy post-modern utopian socialists sipping tea and tediously working themselves into paralysis over some hairsplitting moral quandary as they flit about the galaxy waiting for the deus ex machina of the week to make its appearance. Of course, if that were really the source for names starting with “A”, one has to wonder why they didn’t end up with “Apophis” and “Anubis”.
- James Hansen: Fake, but appropriate.
UPDATE: There seems to be some question regarding the accuracy of the Spectator piece, itself.
- “The monkeys and the polar bears are deep inside my consciousness now. I’ve got to do more.”
Seeking professional help might be a good place to start.
- Blog Comment Zen. Yes, Joe: that it is.
I completely missed it, but yesterday was the fourth blogiversary for Marsblog.
Peggy Noonan seems to have hit a nerve with a lot of bloggers regarding the uselessness of the TSA.
I am almost always picked for extra screening. I must be on a list of middle aged Irish-American women terrorists. I know a message is being sent: We don’t do ethnic profiling in America. But that is not, I suspect, the message anyone receives. The message people receive is: This is all nonsense. What they think is: This is all kabuki. We’re being harassed and delayed so politicians can feel good. The security personnel themselves seem to know it’s nonsense: they’re always bored and distracted as they go through my clothing, my stockings, my computer, my earrings. They don’t treat me like a terror possibility, they treat me like a sad hunk of meat.
While I am not a middle aged Irish-American woman, I must be on a similar list for people with sadly common and/or interchangeable names. I have flown three times in the past two months. The Christmas holiday trip was no big deal (despite idiotically packing about ten pounds of silverware in my carry-on bag…long story, but strangely, I got through with only a post-X-ray hand search of said bag). But three weeks back, I was unable to check in on Continental at DIA…the clerk had to bend over backwards to locate my reservation in the system, and when she printed out the ticket, I could see a lightbulb come on as she read the mysterious alphanumeric gibberish. She didn’t bother to explain, though, she just said it wasn’t a problem — after she checked my passport closely. The same thing happened at IAH on the return flight, but this time the clerk explained to me (somewhat surreptitiously) that it was because my name was flagged for some reason, probably because it is so common and someone with a similar name is “on the list”. Again, she checked my passport closely, and that was that.
This afternoon, the same thing happened when I tried to check in at American Airlines for a flight to Houston. This time, the clerk came right out and said, unsolicited, that “that sometimes happens with very common names” (and again, she checked my passport very closely). But, she said, she would do something (I don’t know what) to “take the flag off” in the “system”, so that I wouldn’t have the same problem on my return flight. We’ll see on Sunday whether it worked, or whether she actually flagged me for the extra-special latex-glove pre-flight once-over just for her own sick amusement.
And this must have been the sister of the guy who waved me into the security line at IAH three weeks ago:
After a half hour in line I get to the first security point.
“Linfah,” says the young woman who checked my ID.
“I’m sorry?”
“Linfah.” She points quickly and takes the next person’s ID.
“I’m so sorry, I don’t understand.”
Now she points impatiently. How stupid could I be?
Line Five. Oh. OK.
In my case, the security guy was completely unintelligible — I’m not sure the sounds emanating from him were even syllables. After he repeated himself twice, I finally gave up, shrugged and smiled, and walked to the X-ray belt, figuring if I was doing something wrong a guard who was actually capable of forming coherent utterances would correct me. Amazing. Not only because TSA would hire people who are unable to communicate and place them in roles where they interact with the public, but also that there are so many people like that nowadays.
I can’t find a link to it, but according to our in-house news clipping service at work, Defense Daily is reporting that Elon Musk’s lawsuit attempting to block the ULA merger was tossed out this past week. Rather contemptuously. Seems the court didn’t see much merit in a lawsuit alleging damages to a launch business that hasn’t launched anything yet.
UPDATE: A snippet from the Defense Daily post (still no link):
Judge Florence-Marie Cooper of the Central District of California wrote in her ruling of Feb. 15 that “SpaceX’s argument is utterly devoid of any concrete factual allegations regarding any type of actual injury suffered”.
Ouch.
UPDATE 2: Aha, I missed it, but Jesse posted on this last week at Space Law Probe.
To answer my own question, I did a little looking around this afternoon, and dug up a few blogs by current and past LPR members.
It sure seemed like there were more than seven hands raised when the subject of blogs came up at the retreat a couple of weeks back.
It’s time for this week’s Luddite Pillory, in which space-related silliness is held up for ridicule and scorn!
- I think this is supposed to be satire. It is in any case funnier (and perhaps more prudent) than this, which, while self-parodying, is not satire.
- Speaking of the Disclosure Project…Francisco Miraval is a bit irked that aliens from across the galaxy seem to get more respect than aliens from across the border.
- Everything you wanted to know about Dennis Kucinich’s space platform. (That would be the space part of the political platform on which he is running for reelection this fall, not the mind-control weapons platforms he frets about when the foil helmet slips.)
- Elaine Supkis has a snit about Mars enthusiasts (hmm…I wonder what prompted that little outburst?). Send all of us “dumb ‘Let’s go to Mars’ lunatics” to Mars? From your fingertips to God’s monitor, Elaine.
- Bruce Gagnon is shocked, shocked that a display area at a conference on nuclear power for space applications didn’t push solar power for spacecraft and lunar outposts instead of nuclear — which is a bit like going to the Stock Show and being surprised at the lack of displays promoting vegan tofu alternaburgers.
- Bruce then tries to make a funny. To paraphrase David Spade: Leave the satire to the big boys, m’kay?
My LPR classmate Joshua Sharf also has a blog.
Judging from the show of hands at the retreat a few weeks back, there seem to be quite a few of us. I wonder if anyone has bothered to put together an LPR blogroll?
I said some time back that we would know that NASA was serious about finally terminating the Shuttle program when they began shutting down the supplier base for the External Tank. (Can’t find the exact post I’m thinking of, but this one is close.)
That seems to have happened a week ago:
Then last week, we received direction to accomplish the work necessary to reduce our existing contract deliveries from 35 External Tanks to a total of 18.
As a result of this direction, we have begun the process of terminating the contracts of suppliers who have already provided sufficient materials to support the production of 18 Sixth Buy tanks. About 100 suppliers will be affected, with the majority in the greater Los Angeles area, although others reside in Alabama, New York, Massachusetts, Ohio, Oregon and Vermont. This action was long expected and now defines our future requirements in support of the Space Shuttle program.
Surprisingly, this seems to have gone unnoticed among space bloggers, with only Clark Lindsay noting it.
The odd thing about this is that, if NASA intends to use the ET as the basis for a Saturn V-class heavy lifter for the VSE, I should think they’d want to keep the supplier base intact. The memo from Marshall Byrd acknowledges the possibility of heavy lift vehicles in Michoud’s future, but states that supplier contracts will be “terminated”. This language pretty clearly precludes keeping the suppliers on some sort of “retainer” or bridge funding to maintain the ability to restart production of key components in the future. One hopes NASA is smart enough not to shoot itself in the foot here, by saving money in the short run at the expense of huge requalification costs in the future when they decide to resume procurement of certain ET hardware for SDLV use.
“He was an excellent crewmember.”
Sorry, JimO, buddy, but a certain Elaine Meinel Supkis is “exposing” your “boilerplate lies” regarding the Challenger “accident”.
|
|