Europe to Mars
It looks like the Europeans are catching the Mars exploration bug. They’re even talking about manned missions by 2030.

News and Commentary on Space
It looks like the Europeans are catching the Mars exploration bug. They’re even talking about manned missions by 2030.
I’ve gone back and restored the individual archive links, and reformatted the monthly archives to be chronological lists of links to each month’s entries. Now all the MT permalinks are back in operation, and I haven’t overloaded my disk space (which, I confess, I need to bump up some more so as to avoid problems like this in the future).
Update: Just changed plans from 25mb to 200mb. I think that ought to tide me over for a while, disk-space-wise.
A New Zealand wool and textiles company is being assessed by NASA as a possible supplier of materials for Mars surface suits.
Hm. Imagine the smell of woolen surface suit components drying on the register next to the airlock — in an already zoo-scented hab. On the bright side, having the astronauts knit their suits on the trip out would help alleviate their boredom in a productive manner.
Jost at Martian Soil says that the next Mars Society conference will be held in Chicago. This was mentioned as a possibility during the Eugene conference, but I had not yet seen an announcement that the choice had been made.
The Mars Society has announced an essay contest, titled “Why Mars?”.
One of the hardest parts of convincing the “person on the street” and therefore the voters, and thence the politicians, is explaining why sending humans to Mars is so critical to our vision of a positive future. The reasons we adopt are as varied as our political, religious and philosophical viewpoints and are usually as well thought out as they are highly personal. It is time to emphasize the importance of why, not just how or when or how much money.
The contest is open to members and non-members of all ages, and can be in standard essay form or “alternative media”. Winners will receive a variety of prizes, from books to conference admission to free MS memberships.
Don Peterson, Former Astronaut, has an editorial at SpaceRef, in which he criticizes the Orbital Space Plane project. Granted, there are many valid grounds for such criticism, but Mr. Peterson succeeds in avoiding the bulk of them, focusing instead on the fact that OSP is not (thank heavens) going to be another Shuttle.
NPR’s Carl Castle this morning reported on China’s announcement that it plans to send a man into space by the end of the year. (Sorry, no links — it’s old news anyway.)
At the end of the piece, he said something to the effect of “The astronauts will be referred to using the Mandarin word for ‘space’, as ‘taikonauts’.”
Huh?
I thought that was a Western/Anglophone neologism, and that the Chinese actually refer to their astronauts as “yuhangyuan”?
Galileo Ends 14-Year Mission in Jupiter.
(Interesting choice of prepositions there…)
Update: Well, these moonbats turn out to have been wrong. [Cue mad-scientist Theremin crescendo] SO FAR…..
What is a hybrid rocket, how does it work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages versus conventional solid and liquid rockets?