MarsBlog.net

Neil deGrasse Tyson shares his views on the Moon-Mars plan.

Overall, his views seem to represent a sensible cross-section of the space community’s interests. He’s for manned and robotic missions, he wants to go to the Moon and Mars, he expects that the new NASA vision can be carried out on a reasonable budget, he quite handily defends spending money on space, and explains the purpose and goals of the new policy in a clear, articulate, approachable way.

He also tosses out an amusing — and intriguing — idea for how to keep the public interested:

The astronaut corps that is slated to go to Mars could be selected as teenagers, then 10 years out they’ll be the right age for landing on Mars.

I can guarantee you those teenagers would be written about in every teen magazine that’s out there. They’ll be heroes in the same way the Mercury seven were heroes to their generation. They’re going to supplant rock stars as who are the coolest people to be in society.

And now we have women astronauts, and astronauts of color, something that was unthinkable in the sixties. So there’s a previously disenfranchised subset of Americans who will want to become scientists and engineers.

It seems absurd or at least astonishing at first glance, but on reflection, he certainly has a point…just consider the possibilities of a “Lunar Idol” nationwide astronaut-candidate competition. I don’t know if interest could be sustained on this basis for ten years, as he suggests, but it could certainly work for 3-4 years.

He also has promising things to say about space commercialization (even though the question was phrased in a nutty way):

I like to take a broader view. Early pilot-engineers, who invented or designed their own airplanes, were supported by the government in the form of a guaranteed load of airmail. That enabled these people to be more and more innovative, to be more competitive to try and get the government contract. What emerged from this were airplanes that no longer required the government support because they could then fly paying passengers.

In developing all the technology necessary to go to Mars, stuff is going to get invented. Look at the government investment in the Global Positioning System (GPS). It was initially a military utility, but now there are commercial GPS receivers in cars and even in wristwatches.

These are whole industries that have been spawned and given unto private enterprise to then make money and create jobs.

If it means we can one day get into space so cheaply that you can set up a hotel, fine, let it be so. If it’s a hotel with a zero-g theme park, fine. Business will go wherever it thinks it can make a buck. Right now space is kind of expensive, so only governments can do it.

Note that that last sentence doesn’t say that space has to be expensive, just that it currently is.

Interesting. I can see why this guy was picked for the Commission.

Writing in Florida Today, Dwayne A. Day makes the same criticisms of Alex Roland as I did… though, admittedly, in a more straightforward and less snarky way.

[via Mark Whittington]

NASA’s Moon-Mars Plans Take Shape

As analysts had expected, a stark financial and resource refocusing is underway at NASA in which robotic efforts will be planned less for pure science and more for supporting future human spaceflight.

The first mission to the Moon will likely be an orbiter that generates NASA’s first digital map of the pockmarked world, officials said Wednesday. It will be a reconnaissance craft designed to help prepare for a return of astronauts as early as 2015, as envisioned last month by President George W. Bush.

The second new lunar foray, in 2009, will be with a robotic lander whose goals are not yet clear.
“These missions will not be driven by science,” said Ed Weiler, associate administrator for the NASA’s Office of Space Science. “They will be driven by preparations for human landings.”

Music to my ears.