Archives

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Typing Pool Mentality

Jeff at Space Politics reports on a debate between representatives of the Bush and Kerry campaigns on the subject of space policy.

Not much new from either side, to judge from his summary, but there is one question-raising point from the Kerry representative, former NASA Associate Administrator Lori Garver:

Garver argued that while exploration is important, it should not be the only thing NASA is working on; it must be done in balance with aeronautics, earth sciences, and space sciences.

“Must”? Why “must” NASA do all of these things? Why not spin off space sciences to JPL? Earth sciences to NOAA, USGS, or even EPA? Aeronautics is part of NASA’s original mandate, sure, but why couldn’t that role be shifted over to AFRL or the like?

It’s well past time to consider whether NASA should have a toe in so many different undertakings merely because those things are space-related, or whether it makes more sense, given the technological and economic developments of the past two decades, to fold those activities and capabilities into other organizations or split them off into independent entities.

What’s Russian for “Biosphere II”?

Russia Plans 500-Day Mock Mars Mission

The 500 Days experiment, under development by the Russian Institute of Medical and Biological Problems, will isolate human volunteers in a mock space station module for — as its namesake suggests — a complete 500 days to study how a long mission to Mars might affect its human crew…

During the 500 Days study, six volunteers will depend on a preset limit of supplies, including about 5 tons of food and oxygen and 3 tons of water. A doctor will accompany volunteers inside the module to treat illnesses and injuries. Volunteers will only be allowed to quit the experiment if the develop a severe ailment of psychological stress.

Sounds….vaguely familiar….

Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers.

Late Reminder

Part 2 of “Black Sky” is on right now on The Discovery Channel, and will repeat again at 9pm MT.

More on X-Prize Cup

Yahoo! News – Private Spaceflight Closer to Reality

The X Prize, offered to the first team to get into space twice in a 14-day span, will now evolve into a regular competition called the X Prize Cup. In May, organizers selected New Mexico to permanently host the X Prize Cup.

…Peter Diamandis said the purpose of the Cup competition is to keep such groups going.

The first X Prize Cup will be held in 2005-06 at New Mexico’s White Sands Missile Range, a vast military installation. It will then move to an area 30 miles north of Las Cruces, where a facility dubbed the Southwest Regional Spaceport will be built.

Teams will compete in five different categories to win the overall cup: Fastest turn around time between the first launch and second landing, maximum number of passengers per launch, total number of passengers during the competition, maximum altitude and fastest flight time.

Diamandis said it is envisioned that prizes will grow to the multimillion-dollar range.

The John Galt (Space)Line

Mark Whittington takes a poke at a particularly silly article by one Gerald Degroot in the Scotsman: Enter the ultimate ego trip.

Some points from the article that I found amusing:

“Every child dreams of going into space,” Branson said. Yes, Richard, that?s true. Virtually every child does fantasise about space travel. But most then grow up. Branson reckons he will have no difficulty attracting customers for his space venture. Sadly, he?s probably right. Arrested development is a common trait among the super-rich, a fact which explains the market for Lotuses and Lamborghinis.

So, having big dreams or spending one’s own money on things one enjoys (or, heaven forbid, both at once) is childish? Heaven forbid we all grow up and accept the sort of mundane, joyless existence Mr. Degroot seems to prefer.

I have also enjoyed reading the endless sniping at Branson in the pages of the Guardian – the chattering classes are always so contemptuous of success.

One might be forgiven for thinking Mr. Degroot is speaking of himself in the third person here.

[Earth seen from space is] pretty precisely because you can’t see the hunger, the cruelty, the pollution and the hatred that despoil the planet. Aids, poverty, crowded schools and homeless people – all the problems crying out for money – magically disappear.

But…whatever happened to the view of Earth from space bringing us together, showing us of how we all share one world, reminding us to work together to build a green-hued transnational socialist utopia? Or prompting the viewers to realize just how small and insignificant they are in the great scheme of things? One would think Mr. Degroot would approve of rich people going into space, if only to have their ostensibly immense egos deflated and potentially replaced with a heartfelt passion to support leftist causes.

Branson wants to capitalise on this vulgar obsession with personalising space. His plans have nothing to do with the dreams that inspired Galileo. They?re space exploitation, not space exploration. Virgin Galactic is simply a new type of extreme sport, a carnival ride, a not-so-cheap thrill.

Read: “This is all about big money for big fun — but if I can’t afford to go, no one else should go either!”

I can easily imagine another member of the populist elite, in another time, making similar arguments against jet travel:

But I?m afraid my admiration stops short of {transatlantic flight}. For all {Pan Am’s} talk of liberating {travel to and from Europe} from the clutches of {Cunard} and offering everyone the opportunity to {sun themselves in Mallorca or Miami}, {the jumbo jet} is, in truth, simply an appeal to vulgar egotism. {Pan Am} understands that quite a few of us harbour a desire to rise above the multitude. {The airline is} offering us the opportunity to do so in {an aeroplane}.

What’s harder to imagine is the notion of a desire to rise above the multitude by engaging in something vulgar.

On the bright side, it appears there is more where this silly rant came from:

Gerard DeGroot is the author of The Bomb: A Life. He is currently working on a book about space travel.

I can hardly wait!

Flee From Cheese

SciFi is showing a movie called “Escape From Mars”, featuring the guy who plays the linguist on Stargate SG-1.

So far, it’s been a clumsy montage of space cliches and contrived exposition, to the point that the sudden onset of melodrama was actually laugh-inspiring. The producers apparently used the same Space Shuttle rental set as seen in Stranded, and borrowed the “meteor shower” from Mission2Mars.

What is it that makes it so difficult to make a decent Mars movie?

One Down, One To Go

Space.com has the skinny on the first SS1 X-Prize flight:
Tense Moments During Trailblazing Private Space Flight

Liftoff

SS1 is on its rollout now.

Fox was briefly reporting this morning that M&M/Mars, 7-Up, and others have signed up as sponsors of an annual follow-on to the X-Prize, to be called the Ansari Cup. This is a clever idea, as it gives the teams that don’t win the X-Prize another chance to demonstrate their hardware — that is, it makes the X-Prize more than a one-off stunt.

SS1 First Attempt

Just a reminder: Rutan’s first attempt at an X-Prize flight will be tomorrow (Wednesday) morning, beginning at 6:00am PDT or thereafter.

Another reminder, The Discovery Channel will be showing the first part of a two part series on the “race for space”, called Black Sky, from 9-11pm (EDT/PDT) on Sunday evening, with the second part the following Thursday (10-7-04).

None of the Above

According to a report in Aerospace Daily (subscription, no link), a report from the National Academies is urging NASA to move quickly with the selection of a systems integration approach for CEV in order that the program can meet the schedule set for it.

Interestingly, the report points out four alternatives for the system integrator role, including NASA itself, a large aerospace company, a non-aerospace company, and a new purpose-built organization. The report includes an assessment of the merits of each alternative, but the AD article only reproduces the downside of each…leading one to the pessimistic conclusion that none of the four organizational classes are up to the task.