Archives

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

SDV on Capitol Hill

Looks like that Shuttle-derived heavy lifter idea is getting noticed. Unfortunately, Mr. O’Keefe seems to be poo-poohing the capsule/SDV ensemble, presumably in favor of the latest NASA paper queen.

Congressmen Take Note of Mars Society Campaign to Convert the Shuttle

In hearings today, members of congress cross-examined NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe as to what he thought of the Mars Society’s idea to converting the Shuttle to a heavy lift vehicle to open the way to human exploration of the Moon and Mars. The plan, which also involves shifting the human launch function from the Shuttle Orbiter to a much simpler and safer capsule system that could be launched at much lower cost aloft a medium lift launch vehicle, was explained in an op-ed Mars Society president Robert Zubrin published in the Sept. 8 issue of the industry weekly Space News. Such a plan, Zubrin said, would offer much greater capability and safety at much lower cost than NASA’s current proposal to spend $17 billion to develop a complex mini-shuttle type Orbital Space Plane as its next major project.

At the hearings, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) [!!! — ed.] entered the full text of the Zubrin op-ed into the Congressional Record, and then asked NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe what he thought of it. Mr. O’Keefe responded defending NASA’s current approach, saying that the ideas in the op-ed represented “wrong headed thinking.” [emphasis added]

So as not to run afoul of SpaceNews, where the op-ed in question was printed, here’s a summary of Zubrin’s points:

  • We have a space station now, and no longer need a vehicle which is itself part space station. Once ISS is complete, Shuttle will be overkill for the functions it will be asked to serve.
  • The crew transfer function does not require a complex and therefore expensive mini-shuttle, it only requires a simple, reliable, and inexpensive capsule. (To this I would add, “and only one run by NASA as a stopgap until private initiatives bear fruit”.)
  • There is a push to make OSP complex, though, as a jobs program for the companies and the thousands of engineers and technicians who currently keep Shuttle running, rather than through any need for a complex vehicle.
  • The result of this is cost estimates for OSP in the neighborhood of $17B.
  • This money would be better spent developing the simple capsule and adapting Shuttle hardware and facilities to serve as a heavy-lift launch system.
  • But this only make sense if there is some use for such a capability. That use should be sending manned missions to Mars.

6 comments to SDV on Capitol Hill