Looks like that Shuttle-derived heavy lifter idea is getting noticed. Unfortunately, Mr. O’Keefe seems to be poo-poohing the capsule/SDV ensemble, presumably in favor of the latest NASA paper queen.
Congressmen Take Note of Mars Society Campaign to Convert the Shuttle
In hearings today, members of congress cross-examined NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe as to what he thought of the Mars Society’s idea to converting the Shuttle to a heavy lift vehicle to open the way to human exploration of the Moon and Mars. The plan, which also involves shifting the human launch function from the Shuttle Orbiter to a much simpler and safer capsule system that could be launched at much lower cost aloft a medium lift launch vehicle, was explained in an op-ed Mars Society president Robert Zubrin published in the Sept. 8 issue of the industry weekly Space News. Such a plan, Zubrin said, would offer much greater capability and safety at much lower cost than NASA’s current proposal to spend $17 billion to develop a complex mini-shuttle type Orbital Space Plane as its next major project.
At the hearings, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) [!!! — ed.] entered the full text of the Zubrin op-ed into the Congressional Record, and then asked NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe what he thought of it. Mr. O’Keefe responded defending NASA’s current approach, saying that the ideas in the op-ed represented “wrong headed thinking.” [emphasis added]
So as not to run afoul of SpaceNews, where the op-ed in question was printed, here’s a summary of Zubrin’s points:
- We have a space station now, and no longer need a vehicle which is itself part space station. Once ISS is complete, Shuttle will be overkill for the functions it will be asked to serve.
- The crew transfer function does not require a complex and therefore expensive mini-shuttle, it only requires a simple, reliable, and inexpensive capsule. (To this I would add, “and only one run by NASA as a stopgap until private initiatives bear fruit”.)
- There is a push to make OSP complex, though, as a jobs program for the companies and the thousands of engineers and technicians who currently keep Shuttle running, rather than through any need for a complex vehicle.
- The result of this is cost estimates for OSP in the neighborhood of $17B.
- This money would be better spent developing the simple capsule and adapting Shuttle hardware and facilities to serve as a heavy-lift launch system.
- But this only make sense if there is some use for such a capability. That use should be sending manned missions to Mars.
I take back everything bad I said about Joe Barton.
He does seem to have changed his opinion.
Let’s hope he doesn’t undo this cautious optimism with some Robert Park-ish comment.
Scrap the Shuttles and build a super heavy lift big dumb booster of much greater simplicity than the Space Shuttle. It’s payload capability would be much greater than that of a Shuttle derived HLLV.
Thanks, Dominic. I’ve noted your opinion.
T.L. James,
Please send my opinion to NASA. I bet they will seriously consider an all new SHLLV after they have read my posts!
You have the same “hotline” to Mr. O’Keefe that I and everyone else does: comments@hq.nasa.gov.