Livestream of EFT-1 launch here.
Broadcast live streaming video on Ustream
I hope my old teammates are wearing lucky ray-gun-girl bowling shirts for the occasion. (Haven’t asked, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some sort of memo came down about that in the past two weeks.)
Looks like there will be Predator drone video of the splashdown off California.
ETA: looks like a scrub for today.
Want: Firefly Space Systems charges full-speed toward low Earth orbit.
There seem to be quite a few entrants in the ALASA-class lately. Which is interesting on the one hand given DARPA’s work in this area 12-13 years ago, and amusing given SpaceX’s exit in favor of EELV-class launchers.
- Sarah Hoyt tackles #Shirtstorm feminism (and a commenter attempting to deploy the standard Progressive argument tactics of snark, strawmanning, and faux-victimhood): No Space for Sewing Circles.
- John Hayward at Breitbart discusses the controversy as an example of thoughtcrime and compares it to #GamerGate: Comet Guy and the social-justice black hole
- Rose Eveleth and her supporters likewise pull out the standard Progressive tactic of painting themselves as the victim when they get called out for doing something wrong: Shrinkage: More charges of ‘doxxing’ by Instapundit ‘downsized’ by accuser
After following some of the #GamerGate foofooraw, I find it hard to take allegations of “doxxing” seriously – that’s the problem with crying wolf and/or faking such things. “Doxxing” as a term appears to be following much more rapidly the trajectory that the terms “rape” and “racism” have taken over the past few years as a result of leftist politicization: its scope and definition being carelessly and irresponsibly expanded by activists to the point that the term loses its impact, ironically undermining efforts to fight the underlying concept to which it formerly specifically referred. Also ironic is that the ambiguity that results from this misuse by Social Justice Warriors is in fact unjust, in that an imprecise definition of an offense makes it impossible to know how to avoid committing it, and makes determining whether an offense has occurred a matter of subjective judgment – or whim – on the part of interested parties. Sarah Hoyt touched on this in another recent (non-#Shirtstorm) post riffing on one of her commenters, who likened this ambiguity to psychological abuse.
- Speaking of Rose Eveleth, imagine my surprise to learn her scientific credentials. New York University, MA: Science, Health and Environmental Reporting; University of California, San Diego, BS: Ecology, Behavior and Evolution — Minor: Writing. “BS”, indeed. One has to give her credit for having somewhat more knowledge of her journalistic beat than the corrupt journo-activists that #GamerGate has exposed, but I wonder to what degree her supposed outrage was really about the “sexism” of the shirt design offending her “feminist” sensibilities vs. a failed scientist’s Salieri-like envy over a man (who clearly doesn’t share those sensibilities) accomplishing something on a level of scientific importance she knows herself to be incapable of ever reaching.
By the way, you can still chip in to buy Matt Taylor something nice:
…To make up for Rose Eveleth, Chris Plante, and Arielle Duhaime-Ross tarnishing his big day with a petty and indecent snit over his shirt.
I chipped in $20.
ETA: Glenn Reynolds gives a short summary of the aforementioned petty and indecent snit, and makes this point:
It seems to me that if you care about women in STEM, maybe you shouldn’t want to communicate the notion that they’re so delicate that they can’t handle pictures of comic-book women. Will we stock our Mars spacecraft with fainting couches?
One can apply his observation to “feminism” outside of STEM, as well: it’s hard to accept a modern feminist’s assertions that she is strong and independent when she expects everyone to walk on eggshells so as not to offend her, cannot tolerate even the most trifling of (often imagined) offenses, and when she inevitably finds something over which she can come unglued in a dramatic show of moral outrage, demands others take action to punish the offender and change the rules to suit her. Those are the attributes not of a strong and independent woman, but of a borderline and narcissist. It’s no wonder that women who are actually competent and capable – and actually strong and independent – seem to eschew the label “feminist” for themselves.
ETA2: Amy Alkon:
Do you think there’s a man alive whose response would be to whimper that he is being chased out of science?
Clearly, feminism is no longer about demanding that women be treated as equals, but as eggshells…
On a side note, there’s a certain kind of nerd who wears that kind of shirt, and I’ve always had a soft spot for that guy and the way he sees the world. The sort of hope and love of space fantasy and dream of a bullet-bra’d fantasy woman of that guy is the stuff jobs landing spacecraft on comets are made of.
I read the imagery on his shirt in much the same way: as ‘space fantasy’ art echoing the pulp magazine covers of Golden Age SF. (But of course, as we know, even that’s not acceptable.)
New Nanomaterial Takes the Stink Out of Submarine Air
Unlike amine, which is a liquid, the new material looks like sand. In fact, it is sand, except it is covered with tiny pores, each filled with molecules that selectively pull CO2 out of the airstream. Together, sand grain and molecule are called Self Assembled Monolayers on Mesoporous Supports, or SAMMS. The pores create nooks and crannies that let even a small amount of the material soak up an incredible amount of CO2—a teaspoon of the material has slightly less surface area than a football field. And it’s reversible. “With a slight amount of heat, you can also open that molecule back up and release the CO2, making it possible to use the same material over and over again,” said Ken Rappe, an engineer at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory who worked on SAMMS.
Orion (last I knew) uses pressure-swing adsorption beds, which are reversible by exposing the CO2-absorber material to vacuum. Since this vents the CO2 (and some water vapor, IIRC) to space, it’s not recoverable for reuse on long missions (e.g.: Mars). If this SAMMS material uses low heat instead to release the CO2, the latter could be captured and stored, and periodically reprocessed to recover the oxygen…by technology whose development, as it happens, NASA is currently sponsoring.
I like the simplicity of this, and the inventor mindset the exercise represents: NRL Invents CubeSat Release Mechanism To Deploy Solar Panels, Tethers
It’s a good motivation to me to do more monkeying around with ideas like this.
Humans may only survive 68 days on Mars.
Tl;dr: Mars One has ten years to come up with Mars-workable versions of common industrial processes and improve the capabilities of 3D printing and desktop machining.
Speaking of the latter – I went to the Maker Faire in Loveland last weekend, and ran into these guys, who are soon to have a Kickstarter for a device which can both 3D print and do light machining: Kanawha Automation.
For those who haven’t been paying attention to the out-of-control Democrat-ruled legislature in Colorado over the past two years, it hasn’t only been gun-grab laws they’ve been ramming through: Braced for Voter Fraud in Colorado.
How Coloradans can’t see what the Democrats here are up to is beyond me. It’s not like the Democrats really go out of their way to conceal what they’re doing – they not only ram these sorts of things through on party-line votes, as Fund notes in the article, they twist and violate legislative procedures to do it.
Remember: Colorado is a “model” and a test site for tactics Progressives will use in other states. Including yours.
Of course, part of the reason they get away with this crap is the fact that Republicans in this state are utterly incapable of setting aside their interpersonal and factional rivalries and self-interest to organize and fight against it effectively. Nor are they capable of ejecting or marginalizing psychologically damaged activists who disrupt and discredit any efforts which are made to do so.