<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As at Microsoft, So at Lockheed Martin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marsblog.net/wp/2012/07/as-at-microsoft-so-at-lockheed-martin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marsblog.net/wp/2012/07/as-at-microsoft-so-at-lockheed-martin/</link>
	<description>News and Commentary on Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike shupp</title>
		<link>http://marsblog.net/wp/2012/07/as-at-microsoft-so-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>mike shupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marsblog.net/wp/?p=2524#comment-4270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gotta agree -- stack rating is a terrible way to deal with people. I do see one semi-reasonable 
argument for it in engineering, however.  Maybe things are much different now, but when I got into
the aerospace business back in the early 1970&#039;s one of the great unmentioned truths about engineering
was that 30% or more of beginning engineers quit the field in two to three years.  What they were 
doing wasn&#039;t congenial or they got suckered into personality conflicts or something more attractive
came along... and they got out.  Assuming something of the sort in modern day IT, I suspect it&#039;s kind
of easy in any reasonably sized collection of programming professionals to pick out the one guy in ten
who obviously isn&#039;t happy where he is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree &#8212; stack rating is a terrible way to deal with people. I do see one semi-reasonable<br />
argument for it in engineering, however.  Maybe things are much different now, but when I got into<br />
the aerospace business back in the early 1970&#8242;s one of the great unmentioned truths about engineering<br />
was that 30% or more of beginning engineers quit the field in two to three years.  What they were<br />
doing wasn&#8217;t congenial or they got suckered into personality conflicts or something more attractive<br />
came along&#8230; and they got out.  Assuming something of the sort in modern day IT, I suspect it&#8217;s kind<br />
of easy in any reasonably sized collection of programming professionals to pick out the one guy in ten<br />
who obviously isn&#8217;t happy where he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
