MarsBlog.net

MarsBlog.net

News and Commentary on Space

MarsBlog.net RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Archive for November 3rd, 2006

While I’m At It…

As long as I’m dumping on the Mars Society, I might as well bring up this little gem, seeing as how it contrasts nicely with how Bob Zubrin’s obnoxious and nasty comments are handled.

Three or four years back, when I was running this blog on the Louisiana Mars Society website, some space nutter got my email address from the site and was pestering me about some crazy thing or other. I finally got fed up with the guy, and told him firmly but (I thought) politely that I was not interested in the foolish garbage he was talking about and didn’t want to hear from him about it again.

Shortly thereafter, Maggie Zubrin forwarded to me a copy of the exchange. Like a schoolmarm, she took me to task for being rude to the guy, which she was not about to tolerate considering I was speaking essentially on behalf of one of the chapters. Now, as much as I resented her tone and thought her reaction far exceeded the seriousness of the matter, I couldn’t argue with her perception that it was her place to criticize me for doing something she felt might reflect negatively on the larger organization.

One wonders where that desire for circumspection at the Mars Society is when it comes to Bob Zubrin’s screeds.

  • Share/Bookmark

Proximate Cause

Behavior like that described in this post is another reason why I abandoned the Mars Society.

I moved to Colorado in June 2004. I had been a board member in various positions in the Louisiana Mars Society until then, and was looking forward to getting involved with what to my eye was the “mother chapter” of the MS.

Of course, 2004 was a Presidential election year, and the Rocky Mountain Mars Society met at the University of Colorado — in Boulder. Meetings were peppered with out-of-context and unprompted snarking about Bush and Republicans in general from several members, and the rest ignored them in such a way that to me implied tacit agreement. As the election grew closer, this behavior became more pronounced. Everyone’s free to have their opinions, and I know better than to expect everyone to agree with mine (especially in “Berkeley in the Mountains”) — it was simply that it was annoying and out of place. The environment was reminiscent of what Judith at Kesher Talk describes in this passage, and that was what made it annoying and turned me off to further involvement in the local chapter:

“People just assume you’re a Democrat.” Boy do they.

Another thing they do which Kornblat doesn’t give an example of, but which we all have experienced: They always start political conversations. None of us do. We have learned that no one wants to argue issues on their merits, that the room gets very quiet and unfriendly, that people start screaming at you, or rant the most loopy beliefs and conspiracy theories. We just assume that is not a topic anyone can treat in a dispassionate manner.

But they always provoke political conversations. Well, not conversations, which would be enjoyable and enlightening. They make pronouncements. And look around the room to see if anyone not only doesn’t agree, but doesn’t agree enthusiastically. As a friend deep in the closet in the theater world put it, you can’t just sit quietly and wait for the topic to change. No, you are suspect if you do not vocally endorse the official opinion of the group. You thought you were in a project meeting or a coffee klatch or a dinner party, and all of a sudden it has turned into the Communist Youth League Self-Criticism Session.

And then, after they have assumed, because no one in the room has fangs or horns, that a political support group is what everyone wants (and they do, except for you) – if you express your difference of opinion, they are offended that you spoiled the intimate feeling in the room by being other than they assumed, based on their superficial reading of you. In other words, they brought up politics, but they are the only ones who get to play. If you join in, you are the one who soured the conversation by bringing up politics. Because they weren’t trying to start a political discussion, they just wanted to commiserate with friends. You party pooper.

Should I join a chapter whose meetings are conducted in that sort of environment? No thanks…I’ve got better things to do.

  • Share/Bookmark

Zubrin Jumps The Shark

Or perhaps he jumped it a long time ago and I just wasn’t paying attention.

One of the reasons I’m no longer involved with the Mars Society (aside from attending their nearby convention last year) is things like this. Sadly, like John Kerry’s “joke” earlier this week, the fact of Zubrin’s over-the-top ravings hardly comes as a surprise anymore…the only surprise is now the increasingly strident language employed. Like a junkie pursuing a fix, Zubrin seems to have a need to make ever more extreme pronouncements to top what’s come before, in order to get attention for himself (oh, and his organization, too).

As others have said, he once showed promise as a great front man for space advocacy. He came to public attention by passionately promoting the cause of exploring and settling Mars in the near term, explaining how it could be done without waiting for wizard technologies to be invented and without breaking the bank. He could have been a new Gerard K. O’Neill, in fact — with the initial popularity of the Mars Society and the contacts this afforded him with celebrities and space professionals, he could have become a leader and popularizer of space settlement for a new generation.

But instead of another O’Neill, he turned out to be another Nixon…paranoid about his enemies and prone to cheap vendettas against those who don’t see things exactly his way.

Zubrin brought space exploration and settlement back into popular culture after two decades, and he succeeded in founding a new space advocacy organization to promote those ideas — he should be given credit for that. But where he failed is in not recognizing that his moment had passed as soon as the Mars Society was born. As Hoffer said, few leaders of mass movements have the temperament to make the transition when their movement becomes institutionalized. Issuing vitriolic missives of this sort certainly indicate he lacks the communications skills and good judgement to be a leader that I would look to.

But what’s especially pathetic about the announcement Keith links to is not really the juvenile name-calling or any specific example of nastiness, but the fact that finally getting what he wanted was not enough for Zubrin. Had the announcement consisted solely of its first and last sentences, it would have been a pleasant and gracious acknowledgement of NASA’s having changed its mind on Hubble to Zubrin’s liking. Instead, he wastes four paragraphs exploring yet again his personal animosity towards a NASA Administrator who has been out of that post for more than a year and a half, and rehashing his earlier over-the-top statements against the man and the earlier Hubble decision.

So much for showing appreciation…not to mention class.

  • Share/Bookmark

 

November 2006
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Blogroll

Archives

Search MarsBlog

Meta